Worldwide Medical Device Regulatory Updates

As medical device quality assurance and regulatory affairs professionals, it can be challenging to stay on top of changes happening in our industry. Few people have the time to read lengthy articles these days and although many online newsletters exist, they are often packed with PR releases, ads or unrelated information. That\'s why we started this blog for QA/RA professionals in the medical device and IVD industry. The idea is to give you short updates on quality and regulatory topics that may be of interest to you. No fluff, just straight to the point. We hope you\'ll enjoy the content.

MEDEC: Health Canada Application Volumes on the Decline

The number of Medical Device License (MDL) and amendment applications to Health Canada’s Medical Devices Bureau (MDB) has declined over the first quarter of 2012, according to Canadian medical technology industry trade group MEDEC (registration required).

Health Canada received 1180 applications during Q1 of 2012, which is 12% lower than the average volume of applications received in Q4 of 2011 and 15% lower than the average volume of applications received over the last four quarters, MEDEC claims.

Volume versus Performance
MEDEC examined application volumes according to device class, as well: Class II applications decreased one percent from Q4 2011 to Q1 2012; Class III application volumes fell by 16%; Class IV applications decreased by five percent; and amendment applications fell by 19%.

But market authorization timeframes have also increased on the MDB’s side, according to MEDEC’s findings. Although application review target times for Class II devices is 15 days, actual review times averaged 24 days for new applications and 37 days for amendments for Q1 2012.

Target timeframes for Class III device application reviews by the MDB are 75 days, but actual times averaged 160 days for new applications and 111 days for amended applications over the first three months of 2012.

Market authorization times for Class IV devices, however, improved between Q4 2011 and Q1 2012. Although still behind target review timeframes of 90 days, new application reviews for the first quarter of 2012 fell to 163 days from 230 in Q4 2011. Amended applications for Class IV devices, however, saw increased review times—from 99 days in Q4 2011 to 123 days in Q1 2012.

While it appears that Health Canada has made some headway in terms of reviewing high-risk device applications, manufacturers of Class II and III devices still face considerable market authorization delays when it comes to medical device registration in Canada

Health Canada Amends Lists of Medical Device Standards

Health Canada has announced changes to its list of recognized list of medical device standards used to demonstrate safety, effectiveness and labeling requirements of the Canadian Medical Devices Regulations in order to foster more efficient device reviews.

The changes to the Therapeutic Products Directorate’s List of Recognized Standards for medical devices have specifically been altered as follows:

  • 28 new standards will be added to the List
  • 10 new editions of currently recognized standards will replace previous editions
  • One standard will be deleted from the List
  • Two standards will be superseded

These changes are part of Health Canada’s ongoing effort to ensure standards it requires licensed medical device manufacturers to follow are up to date.

HC Extends Premarket Review E-Submission Program to Class III Devices

Starting November 1, 2011, Health Canada will extend a pilot program requiring both paper and electronic submissions of premarket review documents for Class IV medical devices to Class III devices, as well.

According to a new HC guidance for industry, the pilot program’s extension to Class III applications are part of the regulator’s ongoing transition to accepting stand-alone electronic submissions. The guidance covers medical device license applications as well as medical device license amendment applications for Class III and IV medical and in vitro diagnostic devices. The program also applies to documents including Screening Deficiency Letter responses, Clarification Requests and Additional Information Letters associated with premarket review submissions.

The HC guidance lists file and data formatting, naming and structuring requirements and suggestions, and also requires letters of attestation from manufacturers verifying that the content of their electronic submissions matches that of their paper filings.

Electronic premarket review submissions will help expedite the device review process, HC argues, and improve data management as well.

New Guidance from Health Canada on Medical Device License Renewal

Health Canada has published new guidance for manufacturers of Class II, III and IV medical devices on the Medical Device License renewal process.

The Medical Device License renewal process entails manufacturers licensed to sell their products in Canada notifying Health Canada annually before November 1 if information submitted with their license applications have not changed.

Right-to-sell fees incurred by license holders for renewals depend on individual firms’ annual gross revenues. For firms with annual revenues of $20,000 or less from sales of medical devices in Canada, a right-to-sell fee is assessed at $50 according to Section 48. (1) (a) of the Free Regulations; firms with annual revenues above $20,000 will be charged $330.

License holders will see right-to-sell fees increase by two percent starting April 1, 2012.

For manufacturers that haven’t completed a full calendar year of selling in the Canadian market by the time license renewals are due, HC will defer their right-to-sell fees until the end of that year, according to the guidance.

The new guidance document, “Guidance Document – Medical Device Licence Renewal and Fees for the Right to Sell Licensed Medical Devices,” replaces “Guidance for Industry – Medical Device Licence Renewal” published August 23, 2005.

Licensing Changes in Place at Health Canada

Health Canada has announced several changes to its licensing processes over the past several weeks, some of which have been reported previously by Emergo Group.

The following points summarize some of the major changes the regulator has implemented for the Canadian market.

First, Health Canada has repealed expiry dates for establishment licenses as of April 1, 2011. Licenses will no longer expire December 31 of each year—provided that manufacturers apply for annual reviews by April 1. Establishment licenses of firms failing to meet that deadline will become invalid.

Licenses for first-time applicants will have no expiration dates, but expiration dates will remain in place for annexes including Foreign Site, Alternate Sample Retention Site and Terms and Conditions. First-time license holders will also have to meet the April 1 deadline for annual review application submissions.

According to Health Canada, the 2012 annual review process begins this year; all establishment license holders will be sent notices to this effect. Firms receiving these notices should respond within 30 to 60 days so that Health Canada can issue all 2012 licenses by April of next year.

Manufacturers should note that Health Canada regulatory processes currently in place for Cells, Tissue, Organ registration as well as Manufacturers Certificate of Export for Medical Devices have not been changed.

Second, Health Canada has established performance standards for issuance of establishment licenses. For medical device licenses, tracking of these standards begins on the date of acceptance of a license application and lasts for 120 days.

Third, the regulator has launched initiatives to boost “cost recovery” and operating revenues. Revised and new user fees for medical device and drug establishment licenses, fee adjustments, payment deadlines and fee mitigation measures went into effect April 1.

In addition, applicant firms that have conducted activities under establishment licenses for one year must submit payment, fee forms, completed calculation charts and certified statements along with their applications in order to qualify for fee remission consideration. For applicants whose conducting activities have not lasted an entire year under license, payments will be deferred for one year.

Additional information is available here and here.

Health Canada Moving to Flat-Fee Structure April 1st

Citing rising costs of performing medical device and pharmaceutical regulatory activities in Canada, Health Canada has announced user fee increases—some of them substantial—for medical device license application reviews, medical device establishment license reviews and right-to-sell licenses.

Health Canada argues that user fees currently in place have not been adjusted since 1995, and no longer align with the costs involved in regulating the Canadian market effectively.

The current fee structure for drug and medical device submission evaluations is linked to the submission type and is component-based, where individual fees are identified based on the type of information provided to support the submission, and added up to determine the total fee payable for any given submission.

The proposed revised fee structure establishes a flat fee for different categories. This reflects the average activity cost and level of effort associated with those groups of submissions; the type of submission is no longer relevant in fee calculations. The proposed flat fee structure applied to drugs and medical devices will simplify the determination of the fee to be charged, more effectively align that fee to respective costs and provide an increased level of cost certainty for fee payers.

Existing fee structures in Canada depend upon submission types and components, with individual fees determined using the information provided by firms to support their submissions. Going forward, Health Canada will impose flat fees for types of licenses being sought in order, according to the regulator, to reflect average costs of dealing with submissions.

All fee increases are set to go into effect April 1st.

Most significantly, the regulator will charge $7,200 for medical device establishment licenses.

Medical device license application review fees have also been released:

Medical Device Licence Application Review Fees as of April 1, 2011
Fee Category Description Fee
Class II - Licence Application   $350
Class III - Licence Application   $5,050
Class III - Licence Application (Near Patient In Vitro Diagnostic Devices)   $8,600
Class IV - Licence Application   $11,750
Class IV - Licence Application (Devices that contain human / animal tissue)   $10,960
Class IV - Licence Application (Near Patient In Vitro Diagnostic Devices)   $20,030
Class III - Changes in Manufacturing Changes in manufacturing processes, facility, equipment or quality control procedures $1,270
Class IV - Changes in Manufacturing $1,270
Class III - Significant Changes (not related to Manufacturing)   $4,730
Class IV - Significant Change (not related to Manufacturing   $5,390

Right-to-sell license fees for Class II, III and IV medical devices will also rise to $330 on April 1st.

Canadian regulators expect these fee adjustments, along with similar increases imposed upon pharmaceutical firms, to generate $66.4 million in additional revenues; over the next 10 years, Health Canada expects the fee increase to result in a $639.9 million boost.

Full fees for examinations of medical device license applications will not pertain to private-label medical devices sold under the names of separate manufacturers. Fee mitigation or deferral may also be available for manufacturers with small revenue sources, those in their first year of business, or firms developing devices to be sold for international humanitarian efforts.

Health Canada’s fee restructuring may seem prohibitive and sudden, especially given the rapid implementation date, but won't likely deter manufacturers over the long run from one of the world’s more lucrative medical device markets.

HC Clarifies Significant Change Guidance

Health Canada has published new guidance defining when manufacturers’ altering of their Class III and Class IV devices constitutes “significant change,” affecting medical device licenses.

The regulator’s Guidance for the Interpretation of Significant Change has important ramifications for manufacturers whose proposed changes to their products qualify as significant changes, because that qualification requires submission of license amendment applications to HC.

The guidance replaces the 2003 Guidance for  the Interpretation of Significant Change of a Medical Device, and is intended to clarify (if not tighten) requirements in Canada’s Medical Device Regulations pertaining to how Class III and IV devices are licensed for sale in the country.

A three-phase assessment tool comprising general principals in identifying significant changes, flow charts to support manufacturers’ decision making, and a list of significant and non-significant examples is provided in the new guidance document.

Key provisions of the new guidance:

  • If a manufacturer determines it has made a significant change to a medical device, the modified device can only be introduced to the Canadian market upon receipt of an amended medical device license from HC
  • Any labeling change adding a contraindication, warning or precaution affecting public health should be immediately implemented along with submission of a license amendment application to HC
  • Manufacturers must document any and all changes made in their quality management systems, and report non-significant changes to devices must be reported to HC during the annual license renewal process.