- USA
- EUROPE
- JAPAN
- CANADA
- CHINA
- BRAZIL
- MEXICO
- KOREA
- AUSTRALIA
- RUSSIA
As medical device quality assurance and regulatory affairs professionals, it can be challenging to stay on top of changes happening in our industry. Few people have the time to read lengthy articles these days and although many online newsletters exist, they are often packed with PR releases, ads or unrelated information. That\'s why we started this blog for QA/RA professionals in the medical device and IVD industry. The idea is to give you short updates on quality and regulatory topics that may be of interest to you. No fluff, just straight to the point. We hope you\'ll enjoy the content.
European Union member states should take immediate steps to tighten regulatory controls over medical devices and technologies in the wake of revelations that French breast implant manufacturer Poly Implant Prothèse Company (PIP) used non-medical-grade silicone in its products.
European Health and Consumer Policy Commissioner John Dalli last week urged coordinated efforts at national levels to ensure full implementation and enforcement of existing medical device legislation to guarantee safety and improve patient confidence in the EU regulatory system.
Dalli’s specific recommendations include verification of notified body designations to evaluate whether these entities are truly designated only for assessment of medical devices and technologies, as well as making sure that Notified Bodies fully leverage their authority laid out in conformity assessments, including their power to conduct unannounced inspections.
Dalli also recommends reinforcing market surveillance processes by national regulators, especially regarding spot checks of some devices. Vigilance system functions must also be improved via granting Notified Bodies systemic access to adverse event reports and urging health care providers and patients to report adverse events to authorities.
In addition, Dalli suggests supporting development of tools to enhance traceability of medical devices in the EU, and tools such as the Unique Device Identification system for monitoring long-term safety and performance of devices.
Finally, results of a stress test being conducted to address any weaknesses in the EU system illustrated by the PIP incident will impact ongoing work to revise the EU’s Medical Devices legislation, according to the European Commission’s press release.
European medical device industry trade association Eucomed has officially expressed support for Dalli’s recommendations, and has added a few of its own as well: utilizing “only the best” Notified Bodies, developing a single approach to vigilance and market surveillance, and strengthening harmonized standards used in the EU. Furthermore, Eucomed recommends more consistent guideline implementation, added transparency and a more integrated regulatory approach.
Whether the PIP controversy significantly impacts how Europe’s Medical Device Directives are revised remains to be seen. Reactions among member states so far do not bode necessarily well for a more unified approach, however; French authorities, for example, have initially taken a much more aggressive approach to the problem than their British counterparts.
European medical technology association Eucomed and the European Diagnostic Manufacturers Association (EDMA) are forming a single industry trade federation to more effectively lobby on behalf of their medical device and IVD manufacturing members.
The associations will name a joint chief executive to oversee activities and develop organizational strategies; however, Eucomed and EDMA will continue to operate as separate legal entities. Furthermore, the new joint federation is open to membership for other European industry trade groups, as well.
A top priority in the short term for the federation will be cooperating with EU policymakers hammering out a new regulatory framework for medical devices.
The UK Department of Health has undertaken a campaign to expand the use of mobile medical devices and services to cover three million patients over the next five years.
Launched in collaboration with the National Health Service, industry and professional partners, the campaign entails deploying mobile medical devices to three million patients through 2016. The campaign’s work plan remains in early stages of development, however, according to E-Health Insider.
Because the capital investments required for establishing telehealth systems can be prohibitively high, according to the NHS, the Department of Health will consult industry to identify ways to address cost issues.
The campaign follows an effort the Department of Health began in 2008 to assess how telehealth would impact the NHS and British social care services; that assessment concluded that proper implementation of telehealth systems could result in 15% fewer A&E visits, 20% fewer emergency admissions, 14% fewer routine or elective health care visits and 14% fewer inpatient hospital stays.
If those predictions hold up, the case for governmental involvement in driving adoption of mobile medical devices becomes compelling.
In a new joint position paper, European medical technology associations are arguing for greater industry participation in the health technology assessment (HTA) process to promote more efficient decision-making and resource allocation.
Associations including Eucomed, COCIR and EDMA argue that increased health care industry involvement in HTA processes used to assess safety, effectiveness and value of medical devices would facilitate system and method improvements. Managing scale, costs and predictability of HTAs requires more substantial input from manufacturers to support regulatory agencies, according to the associations. Medical technology developers have also gained substantial understanding of local and international HTA systems through their compliance efforts; as such, including industry perspectives going forward would make for more robust HTA processes, argue Eucomed and its cohorts.
Medical technology manufacturers produce or sponsor most evidence used to inform HTA processes, according to the position paper, and their “sophisticated” understanding of their products enables them to more effectively interpret clinical evidence crucial to HTAs as well.
The paper furthermore identifies the following stages of the HTA process where industry can play a larger role: overall agency governance of the HTA process; specific technology assessments including data gathering and evaluation of evidence; and reviews of new clinical evidence as it emerges.
Industry desires to affect European medical technology regulation from within is understandable, but may not pan out—consider the Global Harmonization Task Force’s recent move to reform itself into the International Medical Device Regulators’ Forum and reduce input from industry representatives. European regulators may show similar inclinations.
Germany’s medical technology industry has seen sales rates grow by more than five percent according to a survey by the German Medical Technology Association (BVMed).
The BVMed survey had 117 participants, and was released before the 2011 Medical tradeshow in Düsseldorf last month. Key results:
Steps respondents would like to see taken in order to address weaknesses in the German medical device regulatory system include shorter decision-making timeframes by the Federal Joint Committee, as well as reforms for self-governing bodies.
A key question based on the survey results is which export markets are providing the most sales growth for German medical device manufacturers. Are these markets primarily other European Union member states, or they primarily overseas markets in Asia and the Americas? As the European economic crisis continues to unfold, these firms may find it harder maintain sales rates in their closest markets.
European medical technology trade association Eucomed has issued a new position paper advocating six major changes to how the European Union regulates medical devices.
First, Eucomed argues for tighter control and monitoring of Notified Bodies across the EU. Precise and mandatory Notified Body designation requirements, EU-wide accreditation standards for Notified Bodies, and better Competent Authority control over Notified Bodies are prescribed, as well as joint auditing of Notified Bodies by both Competent Authorities and the European Commission.
Second, a single European approach to vigilance and surveillance should be established in order to foster a more uniform level of health protection across member states. Eucomed recommends a more well-defined legal framework for handling vigilance as well as a centralized reporting and surveillance infrastructure used by all EU member states for exchanging device information.
Third, all EU Competent Authorities should adhere more closely to harmonized standards, according to Eucomed, and participate more directly in the development of such standards in order to address mounting implementation issues in European markets.
Consistent implementation of guidelines, Eucomed’s fourth recommendation, entails revising existing procedures for developing guidelines in order to commit member states to uniformly put them in place. In addition, the European Commission’s Medical Device Expert Group should be upgraded from a voluntary to a formal advisory committee in order to establish and manage a more consistent guideline development process.
Fifth, European regulators should increase transparency regarding the Medical Devices Directives’ confidentiality requirements. Eucomed argues that such lack of transparency has undermined public trust in the EU regulatory system and CE marking process. This issue should be remedied by setting up a central EU database at least partially available to the public; the database should include information on devices available on the European market, registration of economic operators, vigilance and market surveillance data, and clinical investigations.
Finally, better coordination and management among European regulators is necessary in order to ensure uniform application of requirements across all member states. To achieve this goal, Eucomed suggests the following steps:
A new report examining European in vitro diagnostic (IVD) market performance in 2010 sees flat or negative growth across most major EU member states due to cost containment measures and worsening economic conditions.
According to the European Diagnostic Manufacturers Association’s (EDMA) study, the European IVD market totaled €10.5 billion last year, with revenue growth of only two percent from 2009. Cardiology testing and diabetes-related IVD sectors as well as products for managing hospital-acquired infections showed the strongest growth rates in 2010, but all other testing areas showed flat or negative growth.
EMDA attributes these rates to European governments’ placing of limitations on IVD testing volumes and reimbursement to balance budgets. (Efforts by governments to implement ill-conceived austerity measures are also not helping.)
Germany remains Europe’s largest IVD market, but IVD revenue growth there was -0.01% in 2010 following a decision by the Federal Joint Committee to end reimbursement for some diabetes-related tests via statutory health insurance.
In France, new laws allowing consolidation of private laboratories also boosted procurement consolidations in 2010. Growth in the glucose self-testing segment totaled 6.4%, but all other IVD segments remained flat over the same period. Price decreases, Cost per Reportable Result (CPRR) efforts and more demanding customers all affected poor growth rates overall, according to EDMA.
The Italian IVD market showed modest growth (1.1%) last year, but late payments of as many as 700 days plagued the region; the market in Italy will likely face greater challenges as the country’s economy worsens.
Spain’s IVD market also grew slightly in 2010, by 0.5%, but EDMA expects pricing pressures to make Spanish market conditions more challenging for IVD manufacturers.
The UK has no official IVD reimbursement system in place, but cost containment efforts there have nonetheless driven laboratory consolidations. Efforts to contain the National Health System’s budget are also drawing more private-sector providers into the British IVD market.
It is difficult to see European IVD growth rates improving substantially going forward, as Continental governments large and small continue tightening health care-related budgets under the questionable assumption that austerity will stave off recession.
Two versions of a draft law amending regulations of pharmaceutical and medical technology products in Francehave been adopted by the French National Assembly and Senate.
The modernization law sets up a collective redress system for litigation similar to class action lawsuits available in the US, and will necessitate reorganization of the French Health Products Safety Agency (AFSSAPS) as well as promotion and advertising of medical devices, according to Eucomed.
Under the law, medical device and pharmaceutical firms would be required to make public all benefits and perks they provide to health care providers, hospitals, patient groups and media. The French Ministry of Health has argued that the threshold for reporting by firms should be €1, but the actual threshold amount will not be determined until finalization of the law.
The National Assembly and Senate must now hammer out a final version of the law; if no compromise can be reached, the National Assembly’s version of the law will stand. Final adoption of the law is expected by the end of 2011.
The German government has formed a committee of industry and regulatory experts charged with developing a national innovation policy for medical technology.
According to German medical device manufacturing trade publication DeviceMed, Germany’s ministries of Education and Research, Health, and Economics and Labor are spearheading the initiative to boost innovation and competitiveness of German medical technology developers, as well as improve patient care and speed up time to market for cutting-edge devices.
The committee will examine issues including funding and regulatory frameworks as well as specialist workforce shortages, cooperation models, clinical trial requirements and alternative funding options.
Committee findings are expected to be available in late 2012.
European medical technology trade association Eucomed has published a five-year strategy for improving the EU healthcare system by more closely aligning medical technology with health care delivery and reimbursement models.
Citing ageing populations, growing labor shortages and other demographic trends posing challenges to the current European healthcare system, Eucomed proposes a focus on “value-based innovation” by medical technology manufacturers in order to improve both cost efficiencies and health outcomes. It is incumbent upon industry, according to the Eucomed plan, to develop a collaborative model with healthcare providers and regulators whereby industry will:
Eucomed also recommends changes in healthcare spending practices, noting that currently only five percent of such spending in the EU goes to medical technology, whereas 70% of spending goes to medical care delivery. Investing in medical technologies to boost prevention as well as efficiencies within healthcare systems will require major adjustments to those spending percentages, Eucomed argues. In addition, the group contends that silo-based funding and reimbursement of healthcare in the EU should be phased out in favor of value-based pricing to incent medical technology innovation as well as better longer-term health and economic outcomes.
Eucomed members will be required to sign on to its plan by 2015. Demonstrating value-based evidence of medical technology can improve healthcare systems could drive European regulators to more fully support the group's recommendations--depending on how convincing that evidence is.









